| 
    Why Did You Buy a Home on the South Shore?A Guest Editorial by Christine 
    Marzigliano
 
    I grew up in Baldwin in a lovely English Tudor home and cherished my 
    childhood playing in Brookside Preserve and sledding on the hills of the 
    Baldwin Golf Club. Trees lined Grand Avenue then and shaded our parades each 
    Memorial Day and 4th of July. I remember returning to Baldwin for the 
    Bicentennial parade in 1976 whereby every former resident stood on their 
    “old corner” and reacquainted with “old” neighbors that had moved away. My 
    fondest memory was of going to Nunley’s carousel each Saturday to win brass 
    rings so that I could return the next Saturday. It’s been over ten years 
    since Nunley’s was “saved,” and it’s time for the County to complete the 
    restoration and allow the children to enjoy the wonderment of riding on the 
    carousel. 
    My grandfather settled in Baldwin after moving from Crown Point, NY in the 
    late 1800’s. He was a world traveler for the Victor Recording Company. He 
    lived briefly in Boston and Philadelphia, but always returned to the South 
    Shore of Long Island to live (Freeport, Hempstead and finally Baldwin). He 
    built his first home on Harvard Avenue and spent the rest of his life there. 
    He took my mother and her sisters to Lindberg’s return from crossing the 
    Atlantic and impressed upon them the importance of experiencing history in 
    the making. All five sisters lived on the South Shore. 
    And so, when it came time to purchase my own home in the 1970’s, I looked to 
    the South Shore. I knew each town well from Rockville Centre to Massapequa. 
    My first concern was in purchasing a home that had a good resale value – a 
    good school system and three bedrooms. I drove my real estate agent crazy 
    finding a home not on a busy street, not on a “T” cross street, one with 
    lots of trees and affordable. I actually found my own home by riding around 
    the streets of the South Shore looking for “For Sale” signs, and when I 
    stepped out into my large back yard, I knew I just had to purchase that 
    home. I’m right on the border of Wantagh and Seaford and have a Seaford 
    address, but am in the Wantagh Fire Department district. 
    I was fortunate enough to know so many of the community volunteers who 
    advocated against pelletization, for the proper placement of cell towers, 
    for keeping our preserves pristine and for keeping up the maintenance at the 
    Cedar Creek sewage treatment plant. I have supported the efforts of such 
    activists and mentors as Betty Blake, Betty Murphy and Vicky Rosenberg in 
    trying to preserve the aesthetic quality of our neighborhoods by Perpetually 
    Preserving our preserves, passing legislation against the removal of trees, 
    protecting our school children from the emissions of the sewage treatment 
    plant and supporting our School Boards in meeting the educational needs of 
    our children. I do not intend for all their efforts to be destroyed. 
    Progress is defined as 1) a royal journey marked by pomp and pageant, 2) a 
    tour or circuit made by an official, 3) an expedition or journey through a 
    region, 4) a forward movement, 5) a gradual betterment. No where in this 
    definition do I see the word destruction. Developers have invaded my beloved 
    South Shore – building house behind house, destroying trees in subdividing 
    properties, destroying streams to create buildable lots, building condos 
    where historic homes once stood, building mega-mansions where modest homes 
    once stood. The entire character of our neighborhoods is being changed and 
    destroyed. And with the increased demands made on our infrastructure, trees 
    are taken down to widen streets, power companies expand to meet the 
    increased electrical demand of our denser population and our sewage 
    treatment plants approach capacity. If we are to “move forward” in a 
    positive way within our communities, we must unite to preserve every 
    existing aesthetic characteristic that attracted us to our communities. We 
    must object to “special exceptions” sought by developers, we must fight 
    against the splitting of lots and we must lobby our elected officials for a 
    moratorium on subdividing existing lots. Our municipalities must “take a 
    hard look” at their existing zoning laws and revise them to strengthen the 
    aesthetics of our local communities (Rockville Centre went through such a 
    revision recently). We must get involved with our Homeowners Associations, 
    civic associations and volunteer associations so that we know what is going 
    on in our community. We must read the Legal Notices every day, seeking out 
    those developers who would seek to destroy our beloved communities. For if 
    we do not take a stand now, we will continue to urbanize – no more streams 
    or parks or preserves, no more trees or woods or wildlife – only dense 
    populations of people “living on top of each other.” 
    My home town of Baldwin lost those large old maple trees in order to widen 
    Grand Avenue by one foot on each side; Nunley’s carousel closed over ten 
    years ago yet is still in storage; the Baldwin Golf Club is long gone; 
    Newbridge Creek was replaced by an underground culvert (yet it still 
    floods); homeowners move to Wantagh Woods and then cut down the trees, 
    mega-mansions replace modest homes (3 out of 7 homes on the east side of 
    Maple Avenue in Seaford have been torn down and replaced this year), condos 
    have replaced old historic homes in our downtowns and, most recently, all 
    the trees have been removed from the two lots to the south of the Wantagh 
    Historical Society Museum in anticipation of the subdivision of these two 
    lots. When the pelletization plant was proposed for Cedar Creek, one member 
    of each family volunteered to seek an alternative to pelletization by 
    working on research, contacting our elected officials, doing legal brief 
    preparation and attending meetings to find out what the health affects were 
    to living near a sewage treatment plant. This was a tremendous undertaking 
    by many concerned citizens. I truly believe we are at the point where we 
    must attend and speak up at our County Legislative, Town Board and Village 
    Board meetings. We must advocate for zoning changes that will preserve our 
    way of life, not allow its destruction. We must each get involved NOW or 
    suffer the consequences. 
    Just look back at your childhood and then look at our towns today – many 
    trees are gone, the old wooden hotels in each town are gone, the main 
    streets are wider and cars are going faster, the railroad is now elevated, 
    many older homes are gone and replaced with stores or condos, large lots are 
    being subdivided, our population is increasing, our schools are more 
    crowded, our infrastructure is burdened, our taxes are higher and we look 
    more like Queens. We must support and attend meetings on zoning issues or 
    stand idle while our small town quality is destroyed. Yes, this takes time 
    and effort. But I believe the results will be rewarding. Many of our local 
    organizations have done admirable jobs in adding plants to our local pocket 
    parks and store fronts, but we need to join together to maintain the 
    residential nature of our communities. I believe that progress should be “a 
    gradual betterment” for our communities, not for the developers that would 
    seek to change the aesthetics of our towns. Please get involved. |